<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1062 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that under the mercantile system of accounting, interest accrued but not due on fixed deposits for a term exceeding one year should not be taxed in the impugned assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of aligning income declaration with actual receipt and acknowledged payable amounts, ultimately deleting the interest income in question from the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1062 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that under the mercantile system of accounting, interest accrued but not due on fixed deposits for a term exceeding one year should not be taxed in the impugned assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of aligning income declaration with actual receipt and acknowledged payable amounts, ultimately deleting the interest income in question from the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>