<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1057 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209035</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of documentary evidence provided by the respondent to substantiate their claim for a refund of credit availed for various input services. The decision was based on the failure of the respondent to submit relevant documents during the appeal process. Consequently, the case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the necessity of factual verification and proper documentation in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1057 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209035</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of documentary evidence provided by the respondent to substantiate their claim for a refund of credit availed for various input services. The decision was based on the failure of the respondent to submit relevant documents during the appeal process. Consequently, the case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the necessity of factual verification and proper documentation in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>