<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1053 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by reducing the disallowance of conveyance and staff welfare expenses to 10%. It deleted the disallowance of cash purchases under section 40A(3) and the addition of commission payments, confirming their business nature. However, the disallowance of office renovation expenses as capital expenditure was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1053 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by reducing the disallowance of conveyance and staff welfare expenses to 10%. It deleted the disallowance of cash purchases under section 40A(3) and the addition of commission payments, confirming their business nature. However, the disallowance of office renovation expenses as capital expenditure was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>