<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1048 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209026</link>
    <description>The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties, arguing that services provided were self services, not falling under residential complex sale. The Adjudicating Authority upheld the demand for services related to residential complex construction, based on advance payments. The Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing appellant&#039;s ownership and development activities supporting flat sales. A prima facie case for waiver was found, staying recovery pending appeal disposal. The judgment underscores establishing ownership and transaction nature for tax liability determination, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a clear prima facie case in challenging tax demands and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1048 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209026</link>
      <description>The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties, arguing that services provided were self services, not falling under residential complex sale. The Adjudicating Authority upheld the demand for services related to residential complex construction, based on advance payments. The Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing appellant&#039;s ownership and development activities supporting flat sales. A prima facie case for waiver was found, staying recovery pending appeal disposal. The judgment underscores establishing ownership and transaction nature for tax liability determination, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a clear prima facie case in challenging tax demands and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>