<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1043 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209009</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision, confirming the genuine purchase and installation of machinery by the assessee. The courts dismissed the appeal, emphasizing factual findings supporting the assessee&#039;s claim and rejecting the reassessment based on alleged bogus purchase. The verification process, including physical inspections and matching descriptions of the machinery, led to the conclusion that the depreciation claimed was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1043 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209009</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision, confirming the genuine purchase and installation of machinery by the assessee. The courts dismissed the appeal, emphasizing factual findings supporting the assessee&#039;s claim and rejecting the reassessment based on alleged bogus purchase. The verification process, including physical inspections and matching descriptions of the machinery, led to the conclusion that the depreciation claimed was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>