<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 962 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld most of the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding various disputes such as disallowance of travelling expenses, guest house expenses, entertainment expenses, and others. Some issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed certain claims based on previous decisions and relevant legal judgments. Overall, the appeals and cross objections were partially allowed, with a few matters needing further review by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 962 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld most of the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding various disputes such as disallowance of travelling expenses, guest house expenses, entertainment expenses, and others. Some issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed certain claims based on previous decisions and relevant legal judgments. Overall, the appeals and cross objections were partially allowed, with a few matters needing further review by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>