<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1035 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 but modified the direction to recompute income by setting it aside to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the prescribed method for determining the Annual Letting Value under section 23(1). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with a focus on addressing procedural errors rather than the imposition of penalties under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1035 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 but modified the direction to recompute income by setting it aside to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the prescribed method for determining the Annual Letting Value under section 23(1). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with a focus on addressing procedural errors rather than the imposition of penalties under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>