<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1031 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds, directing the AO to treat income from subletting as business income, allow depreciation on leased computers, permit deductions under sections 10A/10B for written-back liabilities and miscellaneous income, set off losses of the Pune unit and earlier years, and consider the second installment under section 35D. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1031 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds, directing the AO to treat income from subletting as business income, allow depreciation on leased computers, permit deductions under sections 10A/10B for written-back liabilities and miscellaneous income, set off losses of the Pune unit and earlier years, and consider the second installment under section 35D. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>