<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1027 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208991</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals regarding depreciation on power plants, upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation based on the actual cost of acquisition. However, the appeal concerning interest earned on deposits and advances was allowed, ruling that such interest should be taxed as income from other sources and not adjusted against Incidental Expenses During Construction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1027 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208991</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals regarding depreciation on power plants, upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation based on the actual cost of acquisition. However, the appeal concerning interest earned on deposits and advances was allowed, ruling that such interest should be taxed as income from other sources and not adjusted against Incidental Expenses During Construction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>