<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1026 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208990</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessment order adding unexplained investment in the construction of a house property for the assessment year 1999-2000, based on a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found the notice for reopening the assessment to be justified, provided reasons to the assessee, and dismissed the appeal due to the assessee&#039;s non-cooperation in the assessment proceedings, leading to an ex parte assessment under section 144.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1026 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208990</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessment order adding unexplained investment in the construction of a house property for the assessment year 1999-2000, based on a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found the notice for reopening the assessment to be justified, provided reasons to the assessee, and dismissed the appeal due to the assessee&#039;s non-cooperation in the assessment proceedings, leading to an ex parte assessment under section 144.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>