<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 951 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208978</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order, upholding the exemption claim under Sections 54B and 54F for capital gains on the sale of land. The Court emphasized the necessity of proper documentation and satisfaction recording in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and statutory requirements for exemption claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 951 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208978</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order, upholding the exemption claim under Sections 54B and 54F for capital gains on the sale of land. The Court emphasized the necessity of proper documentation and satisfaction recording in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and statutory requirements for exemption claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>