<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1021 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208976</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a tax liability dispute under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the appeal without requiring the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand, emphasizing cooperation during appellate hearings. Recovery proceedings were prohibited until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The judgment underscored fair proceedings and protection of the petitioner&#039;s rights, relieving them of undue financial burden pending the final decision on the disputed tax and interest amount. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner, with no costs imposed, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1021 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208976</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a tax liability dispute under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the appeal without requiring the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand, emphasizing cooperation during appellate hearings. Recovery proceedings were prohibited until the appeal&#039;s resolution. The judgment underscored fair proceedings and protection of the petitioner&#039;s rights, relieving them of undue financial burden pending the final decision on the disputed tax and interest amount. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner, with no costs imposed, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>