<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 287 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208956</link>
    <description>The court allowed both writ petitions, quashing the rejection of exemption applications under Section 10(23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent was directed to reassess the eligibility for exemption, emphasizing that educational institutions need not operate &#039;solely&#039; for education without any profit motive, and surplus income should be evaluated considering factors like depreciation and capital expenditure. The court highlighted the importance of the society&#039;s aims and objects, emphasizing its dedication to educational activities and development work, leading to the rejection orders being deemed erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 287 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208956</link>
      <description>The court allowed both writ petitions, quashing the rejection of exemption applications under Section 10(23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent was directed to reassess the eligibility for exemption, emphasizing that educational institutions need not operate &#039;solely&#039; for education without any profit motive, and surplus income should be evaluated considering factors like depreciation and capital expenditure. The court highlighted the importance of the society&#039;s aims and objects, emphasizing its dedication to educational activities and development work, leading to the rejection orders being deemed erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>