https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208944 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Kinetic Engineering Ltd., determining they were not liable for service tax under the consulting engineer category for providing engineering services and technical know-how supply. The decision was based on the interpretation of the consulting engineer definition under Section 65 of the Act and relevant legal precedents, particularly a case involving royalty payments for technology transfer. The Tribunal concluded that the technical know-how transfer was not taxable for service tax, aligning with the precedent set in a similar case, and allowed the appeal. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2013 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208944 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Kinetic Engineering Ltd., determining they were not liable for service tax under the consulting engineer category for providing engineering services and technical know-how supply. The decision was based on the interpretation of the consulting engineer definition under Section 65 of the Act and relevant legal precedents, particularly a case involving royalty payments for technology transfer. The Tribunal concluded that the technical know-how transfer was not taxable for service tax, aligning with the precedent set in a similar case, and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208944