https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208935 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 80 lacs to secure revenue interests and prevent delays. The Court clarified the Tribunal's jurisdiction to impose such conditions and directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 60 lacs, considering the Rs. 20 lacs already deposited. The Court rejected the appellant's request to use a Bank Guarantee for the deposit, emphasizing the need for a cash deposit. An extension of time was granted for the deposit, with proceedings to proceed upon compliance. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208935 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 80 lacs to secure revenue interests and prevent delays. The Court clarified the Tribunal's jurisdiction to impose such conditions and directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 60 lacs, considering the Rs. 20 lacs already deposited. The Court rejected the appellant's request to use a Bank Guarantee for the deposit, emphasizing the need for a cash deposit. An extension of time was granted for the deposit, with proceedings to proceed upon compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208935