https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208934 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Revenue Authorities to remove the Central Excise Department's charge entry from the records. The judgment emphasized that while the Excise Department could still pursue its dues from the defaulter or other properties, the charge on the auctioned land was not valid, and secured debts should take precedence over unsecured Crown debts like those of the Excise Department. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208934 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Revenue Authorities to remove the Central Excise Department's charge entry from the records. The judgment emphasized that while the Excise Department could still pursue its dues from the defaulter or other properties, the charge on the auctioned land was not valid, and secured debts should take precedence over unsecured Crown debts like those of the Excise Department. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208934