<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s final order in the case allowed the refund of excess interest paid by the appellant during the appeal. The judge determined that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act did not apply to interest refunds and allowed the appellant to take suo-moto credit for the excess interest without filing a refund application. The judge found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order disallowing the self-credit of excess interest and imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s final order in the case allowed the refund of excess interest paid by the appellant during the appeal. The judge determined that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act did not apply to interest refunds and allowed the appellant to take suo-moto credit for the excess interest without filing a refund application. The judge found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order disallowing the self-credit of excess interest and imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>