<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 737 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208927</link>
    <description>An appealable assessment order fixing annual capacity and duty liability attains finality when no statutory appeal is filed, and its correctness cannot be questioned collaterally in recovery or execution proceedings. A later Supreme Court ruling treating exclusion of gallery length as clarificatory and retrospective did not permit reopening a concluded assessment, because the dispute was not a pure jurisdictional nullity but an alleged error in determination. The settled principle applied was that an unchallenged assessment order remains binding and the assessee cannot resist recovery on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 737 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208927</link>
      <description>An appealable assessment order fixing annual capacity and duty liability attains finality when no statutory appeal is filed, and its correctness cannot be questioned collaterally in recovery or execution proceedings. A later Supreme Court ruling treating exclusion of gallery length as clarificatory and retrospective did not permit reopening a concluded assessment, because the dispute was not a pure jurisdictional nullity but an alleged error in determination. The settled principle applied was that an unchallenged assessment order remains binding and the assessee cannot resist recovery on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>