<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 937 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208918</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, directing the A.O. to refer the valuation matter to the DVO under section 50C and to adopt the fair market value declared by the assessee for the property as on 1/4/1981. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 15th February 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 937 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208918</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, directing the A.O. to refer the valuation matter to the DVO under section 50C and to adopt the fair market value declared by the assessee for the property as on 1/4/1981. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 15th February 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>