<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 284 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the demands for recovery of CENVAT credit on capital goods destroyed in a flood to be unsustainable. It held that there was no provision for credit reversal in cases of natural calamities and that the insurance claim received should not be equated to the value of the goods. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions, allowed the appeal, and provided consequential relief, disposing of the stay application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 284 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the demands for recovery of CENVAT credit on capital goods destroyed in a flood to be unsustainable. It held that there was no provision for credit reversal in cases of natural calamities and that the insurance claim received should not be equated to the value of the goods. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions, allowed the appeal, and provided consequential relief, disposing of the stay application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>