<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 734 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208889</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision to deny input service credit for security services in the residential colony, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of services provided for the welfare of residents in such colonies. The penalty was dropped due to the dispute over the availability of input service credit on security services in the residential colony.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 734 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208889</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision to deny input service credit for security services in the residential colony, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of services provided for the welfare of residents in such colonies. The penalty was dropped due to the dispute over the availability of input service credit on security services in the residential colony.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>