https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208876 The Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A) order and remanded all issues back to the Assessing Officer for proper examination based on supporting evidence, citing lack of proper vouchers. However, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of addition on account of late deposit of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF, as deposits were made within the accounting year before the due date. The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of producing relevant bills and vouchers to support expenses during assessments. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208876 The Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A) order and remanded all issues back to the Assessing Officer for proper examination based on supporting evidence, citing lack of proper vouchers. However, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of addition on account of late deposit of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF, as deposits were made within the accounting year before the due date. The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of producing relevant bills and vouchers to support expenses during assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208876