<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 918 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the additions of Rs. 75,000 for insufficient drawings and Rs. 2,283,518 as unexplained investment. However, the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 918 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the additions of Rs. 75,000 for insufficient drawings and Rs. 2,283,518 as unexplained investment. However, the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>