<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 700 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the limited count of tax levy for work with M/s. Alfa Toyo Ltd., Faridabad, confirming the demand but leaving the penalty aspect for further hearing. For work with M/s. Unitech Machines Ltd., Gurgaon, the tax liability was discharged by the principal contractor, with no liability arising. A tax demand of nearly Rs.80,000 was disputed for services provided to M/s. Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Regarding work with M/s. R.C. Sood &amp;amp; Co. Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.10.00 Lakhs to stay the realization of the balance demand during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 700 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the limited count of tax levy for work with M/s. Alfa Toyo Ltd., Faridabad, confirming the demand but leaving the penalty aspect for further hearing. For work with M/s. Unitech Machines Ltd., Gurgaon, the tax liability was discharged by the principal contractor, with no liability arising. A tax demand of nearly Rs.80,000 was disputed for services provided to M/s. Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Regarding work with M/s. R.C. Sood &amp;amp; Co. Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.10.00 Lakhs to stay the realization of the balance demand during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>