<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208863</link>
    <description>A strong prima facie case justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery where the record suggested unresolved questions on classification of the re-imported product. The appellate record indicated that the BIS flash-point requirement of 35 C had not been adequately addressed, and the rejection of the independent tank test report was not satisfactorily explained. Because the merits had not been finally adjudicated, the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration without insisting on pre-deposit. No final finding was recorded on the substantive classification dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208863</link>
      <description>A strong prima facie case justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery where the record suggested unresolved questions on classification of the re-imported product. The appellate record indicated that the BIS flash-point requirement of 35 C had not been adequately addressed, and the rejection of the independent tank test report was not satisfactorily explained. Because the merits had not been finally adjudicated, the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration without insisting on pre-deposit. No final finding was recorded on the substantive classification dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>