https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208861 Consistency in interlocutory orders is an essential part of judicial discipline; where similar facts are met with inconsistent interim directions, fresh reconsideration is warranted to avoid arbitrariness. In stay matters under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the decision-maker must balance undue hardship, prima facie merits, financial material and protection of revenue, with Rule 41 enabling orders that secure the ends of justice. On that basis, the interim orders were set aside and the stay and pre-deposit issues were remitted for fresh decision after hearing the parties. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208861 Consistency in interlocutory orders is an essential part of judicial discipline; where similar facts are met with inconsistent interim directions, fresh reconsideration is warranted to avoid arbitrariness. In stay matters under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the decision-maker must balance undue hardship, prima facie merits, financial material and protection of revenue, with Rule 41 enabling orders that secure the ends of justice. On that basis, the interim orders were set aside and the stay and pre-deposit issues were remitted for fresh decision after hearing the parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208861