<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208849</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest liability only crystallized with the consent decree in 2001, allowing the assessee to claim the deduction in the assessment year 2000-01. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the Assessing Officer&#039;s position was incorrect, and no legal question arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208849</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest liability only crystallized with the consent decree in 2001, allowing the assessee to claim the deduction in the assessment year 2000-01. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the Assessing Officer&#039;s position was incorrect, and no legal question arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>