<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 570 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the value of study material supplied should not be included in the gross value of services for service tax calculation. The appellants were granted exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. for the value of goods sold. However, the denial of Cenvat credit was upheld, with the Tribunal allowing the appellant to pay a reduced penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 570 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the value of study material supplied should not be included in the gross value of services for service tax calculation. The appellants were granted exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. for the value of goods sold. However, the denial of Cenvat credit was upheld, with the Tribunal allowing the appellant to pay a reduced penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>