https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208817 The court affirmed that the issue of unjust enrichment was still relevant, and the Assistant Commissioner had the authority to decide on it. The court upheld the decision to reconsider the matter, dismissing the appellant's arguments that the matter had concluded with previous court orders. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208817 The court affirmed that the issue of unjust enrichment was still relevant, and the Assistant Commissioner had the authority to decide on it. The court upheld the decision to reconsider the matter, dismissing the appellant's arguments that the matter had concluded with previous court orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208817