<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 795 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208804</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the amount received as a short-term loan, which was duly repaid, did not constitute income under section 56(2)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, no substantial question of law arose from the facts and circumstances of the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 795 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208804</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the amount received as a short-term loan, which was duly repaid, did not constitute income under section 56(2)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, no substantial question of law arose from the facts and circumstances of the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>