<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 913 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal set aside the issue of employees&#039; contribution and ESI payment for fresh adjudication by the AO in light of a Supreme Court decision. Various adhoc disallowances made by the AO were either dismissed as not pressed or restricted by the CIT(A) and Tribunal. The addition of undisclosed income was deleted due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowances related to car and jeep hire charges, total wages and salary, and &quot;Uniform Deposit.&quot; Contributions towards PF and ESIC made within the grace period were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 913 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal set aside the issue of employees&#039; contribution and ESI payment for fresh adjudication by the AO in light of a Supreme Court decision. Various adhoc disallowances made by the AO were either dismissed as not pressed or restricted by the CIT(A) and Tribunal. The addition of undisclosed income was deleted due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowances related to car and jeep hire charges, total wages and salary, and &quot;Uniform Deposit.&quot; Contributions towards PF and ESIC made within the grace period were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>