<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 456 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision based on the documents provided during the appeal. The appeal was allowed by setting aside the initial order, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the documents at the lower authority level. The decision highlighted the importance of complying with statutory requirements and providing complete documentation to support claims for input service tax credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 456 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision based on the documents provided during the appeal. The appeal was allowed by setting aside the initial order, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the documents at the lower authority level. The decision highlighted the importance of complying with statutory requirements and providing complete documentation to support claims for input service tax credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>