https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208794 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for fresh consideration. The appellant's claim that the main broker had already paid the service tax during the relevant period was found to have merit. The Tribunal directed verification of this claim by the main broker's jurisdictional authority, giving the appellant 30 days to provide supporting evidence. The decision underscores the importance of proper verification and specific identification of payments in tax liability cases, ensuring a fair review process. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208794 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for fresh consideration. The appellant's claim that the main broker had already paid the service tax during the relevant period was found to have merit. The Tribunal directed verification of this claim by the main broker's jurisdictional authority, giving the appellant 30 days to provide supporting evidence. The decision underscores the importance of proper verification and specific identification of payments in tax liability cases, ensuring a fair review process. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208794