<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 276 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for re-decision after the appellants presented the EODC certificate. The appeal was disposed of to ensure a fair assessment based on the updated information provided by the appellants, emphasizing the need to verify and examine the newly presented certificate. The stay application and appeal were both disposed of in this manner, with the Tribunal pronouncing its decision in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 276 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for re-decision after the appellants presented the EODC certificate. The appeal was disposed of to ensure a fair assessment based on the updated information provided by the appellants, emphasizing the need to verify and examine the newly presented certificate. The stay application and appeal were both disposed of in this manner, with the Tribunal pronouncing its decision in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>