<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208784</link>
    <description>Fixed dose combination tablets of Vitamin B1, B6 and B12 were treated as medicaments, not Chapter 29 chemical products, because prior Tribunal decisions had already settled the classification in the same manner, including in the assessee&#039;s own case. The Tribunal accordingly accepted classification under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff, rejected the revenue&#039;s Chapter 29 contention, sustained the order setting aside the demand, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208784</link>
      <description>Fixed dose combination tablets of Vitamin B1, B6 and B12 were treated as medicaments, not Chapter 29 chemical products, because prior Tribunal decisions had already settled the classification in the same manner, including in the assessee&#039;s own case. The Tribunal accordingly accepted classification under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff, rejected the revenue&#039;s Chapter 29 contention, sustained the order setting aside the demand, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>