https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208781 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order confirming duty demands, penalties, and confiscation of goods due to violations of natural justice in the adjudication process. The case involved suspicions of central excise duty evasion through manufacturing activities by a company producing auto parts under the KAMEI brand. Searches revealed incriminating evidence, leading to the issuance of a show cause notice and subsequent adjudication. The appellant successfully argued that crucial evidence was not considered, prompting the Tribunal to remand the matter for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and evidence consideration in such cases. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208781 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order confirming duty demands, penalties, and confiscation of goods due to violations of natural justice in the adjudication process. The case involved suspicions of central excise duty evasion through manufacturing activities by a company producing auto parts under the KAMEI brand. Searches revealed incriminating evidence, leading to the issuance of a show cause notice and subsequent adjudication. The appellant successfully argued that crucial evidence was not considered, prompting the Tribunal to remand the matter for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and evidence consideration in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208781