<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208780</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a final order confirming duty liability and penalty for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act before resorting to writ petitions, the court ordered the petition to be returned for conversion into a CMA for disposal before the appropriate bench, aiming to resolve the long-pending litigation effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208780</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a final order confirming duty liability and penalty for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act before resorting to writ petitions, the court ordered the petition to be returned for conversion into a CMA for disposal before the appropriate bench, aiming to resolve the long-pending litigation effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>