<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 92 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208778</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision on the valuation of undisclosed stock, correction of valuation discrepancies, and emphasized the importance of objecting to stock valuations during surveys. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the principles of stock valuation and the necessity of proper consideration of reconciliation details in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 92 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208778</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision on the valuation of undisclosed stock, correction of valuation discrepancies, and emphasized the importance of objecting to stock valuations during surveys. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the principles of stock valuation and the necessity of proper consideration of reconciliation details in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>