<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 91 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208777</link>
    <description>Interest paid on delayed payment of additional sales tax was treated as a statutory liability arising automatically under the sales tax law, because section 17-A(2) made interest payable once the tax was not paid within time. That liability was not dependent on a separate demand notice. As section 43B permits deduction only on actual payment of sums payable by way of tax, duty, cess or fee, the interest payment was held to be allowable as a deduction when paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 91 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208777</link>
      <description>Interest paid on delayed payment of additional sales tax was treated as a statutory liability arising automatically under the sales tax law, because section 17-A(2) made interest payable once the tax was not paid within time. That liability was not dependent on a separate demand notice. As section 43B permits deduction only on actual payment of sums payable by way of tax, duty, cess or fee, the interest payment was held to be allowable as a deduction when paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>