<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208775</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by attempting to re-open an assessment beyond four years from the end of the Assessment Year under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reasons provided did not show a failure by the Assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, and the matters were already subject to an appeal. Therefore, the court set aside the notice issued by the Assessing Officer on 30 March 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208775</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by attempting to re-open an assessment beyond four years from the end of the Assessment Year under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reasons provided did not show a failure by the Assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, and the matters were already subject to an appeal. Therefore, the court set aside the notice issued by the Assessing Officer on 30 March 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>