<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 303 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208761</link>
    <description>Services such as bandwidth, IT-enabled, security, catering and immovable property renting were found to have a direct nexus with exported output services, so they qualified as input services and supported refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. A limited direction to the original authority to verify the claimed amount and prescribed certificate for quantification did not amount to an impermissible remand because the merits had already been decided. The departmental challenge failed and the refund entitlement was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 303 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208761</link>
      <description>Services such as bandwidth, IT-enabled, security, catering and immovable property renting were found to have a direct nexus with exported output services, so they qualified as input services and supported refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. A limited direction to the original authority to verify the claimed amount and prescribed certificate for quantification did not amount to an impermissible remand because the merits had already been decided. The departmental challenge failed and the refund entitlement was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>