https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208747 Where the Tribunal had extended a stay of recovery, the department could not appropriate sanctioned rebate amounts against the stayed central excise demand. The extended stay bound the lower authorities, so adjustment of rebate claims against the pending demand was not sustainable. The Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in directing reconsideration of the rebate claims after verification, and the revisional challenge failed. The order permitting sanction of the rebate claims, subject to necessary verification, was sustained. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208747 Where the Tribunal had extended a stay of recovery, the department could not appropriate sanctioned rebate amounts against the stayed central excise demand. The extended stay bound the lower authorities, so adjustment of rebate claims against the pending demand was not sustainable. The Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in directing reconsideration of the rebate claims after verification, and the revisional challenge failed. The order permitting sanction of the rebate claims, subject to necessary verification, was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208747