<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 905 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208730</link>
    <description>Estimation of income on a best-judgment basis was upheld where the assessee had not maintained books of account. The appellate authority estimated income per truck by relying on past history, the nature of the transport business, material placed before the Settlement Commission, and comparable receipts of family members in similar business. The Tribunal agreed that, in the absence of books, no precise mathematical formula was possible and the matter depended on factual appreciation rather than a legal principle. No substantial question of law arose under section 260A, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the factual estimate was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 905 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208730</link>
      <description>Estimation of income on a best-judgment basis was upheld where the assessee had not maintained books of account. The appellate authority estimated income per truck by relying on past history, the nature of the transport business, material placed before the Settlement Commission, and comparable receipts of family members in similar business. The Tribunal agreed that, in the absence of books, no precise mathematical formula was possible and the matter depended on factual appreciation rather than a legal principle. No substantial question of law arose under section 260A, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the factual estimate was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>