https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208727 The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh adjudication to quantify the service tax demand after accounting for the input service tax credit eligibility. The appellant's argument of acting as a pure agent was not accepted, emphasizing the need to pay service tax on the gross amount charged to clients as per Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules. No penalty was imposed, and the appellant was given a chance to provide necessary evidence for their claim. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208727 The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh adjudication to quantify the service tax demand after accounting for the input service tax credit eligibility. The appellant's argument of acting as a pure agent was not accepted, emphasizing the need to pay service tax on the gross amount charged to clients as per Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules. No penalty was imposed, and the appellant was given a chance to provide necessary evidence for their claim. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208727