https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208713 The appellants were directed to deposit 20% of the confirmed duty for their appeal hearing. After depositing Rs.9 lakhs and citing a Tribunal decision, the direction was modified to pre-deposit 25% of the duty, considering the previous deposit sufficient. The Tribunal referenced a previous case to allow stay petitions without pre-deposits once matters were remanded, leading to the modification of the original direction. The Tribunal found the deposit of Rs.9 lakhs sufficient for the appeal involving modvat credit based on fake invoices. The modification application and appeals were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents in similar cases. en-us Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208713 The appellants were directed to deposit 20% of the confirmed duty for their appeal hearing. After depositing Rs.9 lakhs and citing a Tribunal decision, the direction was modified to pre-deposit 25% of the duty, considering the previous deposit sufficient. The Tribunal referenced a previous case to allow stay petitions without pre-deposits once matters were remanded, leading to the modification of the original direction. The Tribunal found the deposit of Rs.9 lakhs sufficient for the appeal involving modvat credit based on fake invoices. The modification application and appeals were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents in similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208713