<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 754 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208707</link>
    <description>Voluntary Retirement Scheme compensation or ex gratia does not exclude relief under section 89(1), and the Court reiterated that such receipt may be considered alongside the exemption under section 10(10C). Applying its earlier binding view, it held that section 89 is intended to mitigate tax hardship and there is no statutory prohibition on simultaneous availability of both benefits. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was therefore upheld, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 754 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208707</link>
      <description>Voluntary Retirement Scheme compensation or ex gratia does not exclude relief under section 89(1), and the Court reiterated that such receipt may be considered alongside the exemption under section 10(10C). Applying its earlier binding view, it held that section 89 is intended to mitigate tax hardship and there is no statutory prohibition on simultaneous availability of both benefits. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was therefore upheld, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>