<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 688 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208705</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi addressed appeals regarding the marketability of flavoured cream as an intermediate product in biscuit manufacturing. Emphasizing the need to assess the cream&#039;s marketability independently from the final product, the Tribunal overturned the previous orders due to errors in evaluating the two separately. The case highlighted the importance of distinguishing between the marketability of intermediate and final products, ensuring a proper assessment aligned with established legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh evaluation by the Adjudicating Authority to avoid confusion and ensure accurate adjudication in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 688 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208705</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi addressed appeals regarding the marketability of flavoured cream as an intermediate product in biscuit manufacturing. Emphasizing the need to assess the cream&#039;s marketability independently from the final product, the Tribunal overturned the previous orders due to errors in evaluating the two separately. The case highlighted the importance of distinguishing between the marketability of intermediate and final products, ensuring a proper assessment aligned with established legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh evaluation by the Adjudicating Authority to avoid confusion and ensure accurate adjudication in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>