<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 290 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s services for marriage functions constituted Mandap Keeper service, not Pandal or Shamiana service, making them taxable. The Tribunal clarified that marriage functions are social events, regardless of religious elements, and upheld the taxability of these services. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous classification and dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 290 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s services for marriage functions constituted Mandap Keeper service, not Pandal or Shamiana service, making them taxable. The Tribunal clarified that marriage functions are social events, regardless of religious elements, and upheld the taxability of these services. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous classification and dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>