https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208686 The dispute concerned classification of the appellant's services as hire purchase services or banking and other financial services for the relevant period. A later appellate order, relying on the Tribunal's decision in Bajaj Auto Finance Limited, had held that the services were not covered under the hire purchase category. In light of that subsequent order and the reasoning adopted there, the impugned order could not be sustained without reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208686 The dispute concerned classification of the appellant's services as hire purchase services or banking and other financial services for the relevant period. A later appellate order, relying on the Tribunal's decision in Bajaj Auto Finance Limited, had held that the services were not covered under the hire purchase category. In light of that subsequent order and the reasoning adopted there, the impugned order could not be sustained without reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208686