<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 783 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208685</link>
    <description>The judge upheld the dropping of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as it was beyond the scope of the show-cause notice. Additionally, the reduction of penalty under section 77 from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 3,000 was deemed appropriate within the legal limits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the decision of the lower appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 783 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208685</link>
      <description>The judge upheld the dropping of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as it was beyond the scope of the show-cause notice. Additionally, the reduction of penalty under section 77 from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 3,000 was deemed appropriate within the legal limits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the decision of the lower appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>